- ADR and college football: In the course of its struggle to free itself from the Big East conference, West Virginia University finds itself ordered to engage in non-binding mediation with conference reps.
- Same ADR process, very different context: The Department of Justice hopes that mediation can serve as a foreclosure intervention.
- Worlds collide: The 9th Circuit tries to sort out the complicated jurisprudence on the reach of the Federal Arbitration Act.
- Across the globe, a journalist reflects on over 30 years of negotiations in the Middle East, and makes a pitch for Saudi Arabia to join the table.
- Finally, a new study finds that some surprisingly simple instructions can affect women’s success in negotiations.
This week in ADR: January 8-January 15
Posted by HNLR / In Lead Article /
Recent From HNLR
About HNLR
Negotiation, not adjudication, resolves most legal conflicts. However, despite the fact that dispute resolution is central to the practice of law and has become a “hot” topic in legal circles, a gap in the literature persists. “Legal negotiation” — negotiation with lawyers in the middle and legal institutions in the background — has escaped systematic analysis.
The Harvard Negotiation Law Review works to close this gap by providing a forum in which scholars from many disciplines can discuss negotiation as it relates to law and legal institutions. It is aimed specifically at lawyers and legal scholars. In its 18 year history, the journal has explored interdisciplinary academic perspectives on such topics as decision analysis; litigation settlement; mediator roles, strategies and tactics; the lawyer’s role as a problem solver; reconsideration of legal education in light of negotiation; and a range of case studies of innovative negotiation and mediation systems around the world.








No comments
Be the first one to leave a comment.